Choosing between supastarter and Shipixen? We've compared both boilerplates across pricing, features, tech stack, and more. Shipixen is $13 cheaper, but pricing isn't everything. Let's dive into the details.
Production-ready SaaS app templates for NextJS, Nuxt or SvelteKit, complete with essential features like auth, i18n, and billing.
Versatile template for creating SaaS, blogs, landing pages, and more, enabling quick idea implementation.
| Comparison | supastarter | Shipixen |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $100 | $87 |
| Blog | ✓ | ✓ |
| Components | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auth | ✓ | — |
| AI | ✓ | — |
| Database | ✓ | — |
| Stripe | ✓ | — |
| Lemon Squeezy | ✓ | — |
| ✓ | — | |
| Payments | ✓ | — |
| Themes | — | ✓ |
| Dark Mode | — | ✓ |
Choose supastarter if you prioritize Auth and Blog. Choose Shipixen if Components and Themes are more important to your project.
supastarter costs $100 and includes 9 features. Shipixen costs $87 and includes 4 features. supastarter uniquely offers Auth, AI, Database. Shipixen uniquely offers Themes, Dark Mode.
Shipixen is cheaper at $87, which is $13 less than supastarter ($100).
Yes, both share NextJS, Tailwind in common. supastarter uses Nuxt, SvelteKit exclusively, while Shipixen uses no unique tech exclusively.
supastarter has more features (9 vs 4). See the feature matrix above for the full breakdown.
Choose supastarter if you need Auth and Blog and prefer its tech stack. Choose Shipixen if Components and Themes are higher priorities. If price is the deciding factor, Shipixen is $$13 cheaper.