Saas.js vs Shipixen: Head-to-Head Comparison
Choosing between Saas.js and Shipixen? We've compared both boilerplates across pricing, features, tech stack, and more. Shipixen is $158 cheaper, but pricing isn't everything. Let's dive into the details.
At a glance: Saas.js costs $245 - $949 and Shipixen costs $87 - $259, so Shipixen is $158 cheaper to start. Both are built on NextJS. Only Saas.js lists Auth, Payments, Database, Email, Multi-tenancy. Only Shipixen lists Blog. Updated 2026-11-05.
Saas.js
Saas.js (formerly Saas UI): TanStack Start and Next.js starter kit for B2B SaaS with Better Auth, workspaces, Stripe billing, Drizzle, tRPC and tests.
Shipixen
Versatile template for creating SaaS, blogs, landing pages, and more, enabling quick idea implementation.
Saas.js Tech Stack
NextJS Better Auth 
React 
TypeScript 
Chakra 
Figma 
PostgreSQL 
Drizzle 
TanStack 
Playwright 
Resend 
Stripe Shipixen Tech Stack
NextJS 
Tailwind | Specification | Saas.js | Shipixen |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $245 | $87 |
| Price range | $245 - $949 | $87 - $259 |
| Stack | NextJS, Better Auth, React, TypeScript, Chakra, Figma, PostgreSQL, Drizzle, TanStack, Playwright, Resend, Stripe | NextJS, Tailwind |
| Integrations listed | 15 | 4 |
| Auth | ✓ | — |
| Payments | ✓ | — |
| Database | ✓ | — |
| ✓ | — | |
| AI | — | — |
| Admin Panel | — | — |
| Multi-tenancy | ✓ | — |
| SEO | — | — |
| Blog | — | ✓ |
| Analytics | — | — |
| Agent readiness · checked 2026-08-17 | ||
| AGENTS.md included | ✓ | ? |
| CLAUDE.md included | ✓ | ? |
| Cursor rules included | — | ✓ |
| Ships Claude skills | — | ? |
| Ships subagents | — | ? |
| MCP integrations | ✓ | ? |
| Tests an agent can run | ✓ | ? |
| TypeScript | ✓ | ? |
| Agent-readiness score | 65/100 | 13/100 |
| Everything else either kit lists | ||
| 2FA | ✓ | — |
| API | ✓ | — |
| Billing | ✓ | — |
| CI/CD | ✓ | — |
| Components | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dark Mode | — | ✓ |
| Dashboard | ✓ | — |
| Documentation | ✓ | — |
| Onboarding | ✓ | — |
| Themes | ✓ | ✓ |
| User Management | ✓ | — |
A question mark means the vendor's public documentation does not mention that capability. It is not a statement that the boilerplate lacks it. How we score agent readiness
Specifications last updated , from the BoilerplateHub catalog.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Saas.js if you prioritize 2FA and API. Choose Shipixen if Blog and Components are more important to your project.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Saas.js and Shipixen?
Saas.js costs $245 and includes 15 features. Shipixen costs $87 and includes 4 features. Saas.js uniquely offers 2FA, API, Auth. Shipixen uniquely offers Blog, Dark Mode.
Which is cheaper, Saas.js or Shipixen?
Shipixen is cheaper at $87, which is $158 less than Saas.js ($245).
Do Saas.js and Shipixen use the same tech stack?
Yes, both share NextJS in common. Saas.js uses Better Auth, React, TypeScript, Chakra, Figma, PostgreSQL, Drizzle, TanStack, Playwright, Resend, Stripe exclusively, while Shipixen uses Tailwind exclusively.
Which has more features, Saas.js or Shipixen?
Saas.js has more features (15 vs 4). See the feature matrix above for the full breakdown.
Should I choose Saas.js or Shipixen?
Choose Saas.js if you need 2FA and API and prefer its tech stack. Choose Shipixen if Blog and Components are higher priorities. If price is the deciding factor, Shipixen is $$158 cheaper.